Cases 11 - 20 of 58
COVINGTON et al v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2019cv03375
Plaintiff:
GREGG BLANK, VERA COVINGTON and CHARLES G. COVINGTON
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORP., MERCK SHARP AND DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COVINGTON v. BUCKS COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2019cv03062
Defendant:
BUCKS COUNTY CORRECTIONAL OFFICER LAWS, ANTHONY DISANDRO, LIEUTENANT ROBERT GORMAN and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES COVINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Covington v. Ebbert
as 3:2019cv00921
Petitioner:
Ronnie Dakota Covington
Respondent:
Warden Ebbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Pepper et al v. Covington
as 3:2019cv00758
Defendant:
Timothy J. Covington
Plaintiff:
Phillip S. Pepper and Kaylin L. Clinton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01900
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DEDICATED NURSING ASSOCIATES, INC. v. BEACON HEALTH MANAGEMENT LLC et al
as 2:2018cv01233
Defendant:
BEACON HEALTH MANAGEMENT LLC, EAGLEWOOD VILLAG, LLC, COVINGTON REALTY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DEDICATED NURSING ASSOCIATES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clark v. C.O. Covington et al
as 1:2017cv02309
Plaintiff:
Donald E. Clark
Defendant:
C.O. Covington, Sgt. John Doe, Sgt. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COVINGTON v. BERRYHILL
as 2:2017cv00883
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEWIS COVINGTON, JR.
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02703
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COVINGTON v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv05827
Plaintiff:
ROBERT COVINGTON
Defendant:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. , JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, LLC , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
