Cases 11 - 20 of 153
Barnett et al v. Worley et al
as 2:2022cv00060
Plaintiff:
Richard Barnett, William E. Benge, Christopher Lee Duff and others
Defendant:
Amanda Worley, Jennifer Phillips Cross, Patricia Eldridge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00847
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Inman v. Sharp et al
as 1:2022cv01025
Plaintiff:
Scotty Inman
Defendant:
Officer FNU Sharp, Warden Danny Dodd, Warden Hilton Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00715
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hines v. Blue Cross Blue Shield et al
as 1:2021cv01053
Defendant:
Blue Cross Blue Shield and Dan Laytin Kirkland & Ellis LLP
Plaintiff:
Tyler Hines
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Cross v. ARP-GOLD-64 Bypass at Durkee Road LLC (TV2)
as 3:2021cv00048
Defendant:
Sullivan Painting, Inc., RI TN 2, LLC. d/b/a Circle K Store, ARP-GOLD-64 Bypass at Durkee Road LLC d/b/a Circle K Store and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Cross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Windom v. Tennessee Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv01269
Defendant:
Keith Harding, Tony Parker, Lee Dotson and others
Plaintiff:
Ronardo L. Windom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cross v. Barr et al (TV1)
as 3:2020cv00414
Plaintiff:
Trent Cross
Defendant:
Timothy J Shea and William P Barr
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Cross v. Hamilton County Government (PLR3)
as 1:2020cv00227
Plaintiff:
Kelly Cross
Defendant:
Hamilton County Government
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Henderson v. SONIC DRIVE IN, MEMPHIS, POPLAR, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP et al
as 2:2020cv02604
Defendant:
SONIC DRIVE IN, MEMPHIS, COVINGTON PIKE, LLC, SONIC DRIVE IN, OLIVE BRANCH, MS, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, RONALD SOLBERG and others
Plaintiff:
Tyaire Henderson
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
