Cases 11 - 20 of 197
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv22569
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv01207
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
CARD v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv08740
Plaintiff:
CLAIRE CARD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
In Re: Medical Security Card Company, LLC
as 2:2023mc14097
Petitioner:
Medical Security Card Company, LLC
Respondent:
SASB Corporation individually and as the representative of a class of similarly situated persons doing business as Okeechobee Discount Drug
TANTON v 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv07507
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM TANTON, MARK BAILEY, ANDREW ITO and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Graham v. Chisholm et al
as 3:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
Robert K. Graham
Defendant:
Melinda Chisholm, Ms. Card, Polk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayes v. The Walt Disney Company et al
as 6:2023cv00252
Plaintiff:
Cheron Hayes
Defendant:
The Walt Disney Company, Disney Parks, Experiences and Products, Inc., Disney Gift Card Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Price v. American Express et al
as 9:2023cv80148
Plaintiff:
Richard Anthony Price
Defendant:
American Express, Master Card, Visa Card and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
CARD v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv00804
Plaintiff:
BRIAN CARD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
