Cases filed in Georgia
Cases 11 - 20 of 45
Allen et al v. The Cato Corporation
as 1:2018cv05139
Defendant: The Cato Corporation
Plaintiff: CATOSOUTH, LLC and Mary R. Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
JOHNSON v. REYNOLDS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv00013
Plaintiff: JENNIFER JOHNSON
Defendant: EDWARD REYNOLDS, CITY OF BAINBRIDGE, TERESA COOK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOYD v. HALL et al
as 1:2017cv03490
Petitioner: Ahquan Dante Boyd
Respondent: Philip Hall , Adam W. Cato and Karen Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Woodruff et al v. Nation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv03232
Plaintiff: Randall Woodruff, Michael Shane Woodruff, Wooden Nickel Holdings LLC and others
Defendant: Sidney Nation, Harry Altman, Brian McDaniel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Star Homes Enterprises LLC v. Roland We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv02308
Plaintiff: Star Homes Enterprises LLC
Defendant: Cato Ralph Roland
Movant: Andre R. Cato
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Star Homes Enterprises LLC v. Roland We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv01380
Plaintiff: Star Homes Enterprises LLC
Defendant: Cato Ralph Roland
Movant: Andre E. Cato
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
BARBER v. THE CATO CORPORATION
as 5:2017cv00117
Plaintiff: TERESA BARBER
Defendant: THE CATO CORPORATION and SANDY PLAINS JUNCTION LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Boyd v. Hall et al
as 1:2017cv00616
Petitioner: Ahquan D. Boyd
Respondent: Philip Hall, Adam W. Cato and Karen Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BOYD v. HALL et al
as 1:2017cv00033
Petitioner: AHQUAN DANTE BOYD
Respondent: PHILIP HALL, ADAM W CATO and KAREN TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CATO v. BERRYHILL
as 4:2017cv00027
Plaintiff: DAVID W CATO
Defendant: NANCY A BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?