Cases 11 - 20 of 123
Chapman v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 2:2023cv00710
Plaintiff:
Kimberly A Chapman
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00346
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12201 Americans with Disabilities Act
Chiles et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00285
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Willie Jerome Chiles, Dennis Joseph Cardoza, Benjamin Franklin Carey, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv01330
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Mays v. Cohen (INMATE 1)
as 2:2022cv00460
Plaintiff:
Chapman Rogers Mays
Defendant:
Alan Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00267
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Omatie v. Thompson et al
as 5:2022cv00286
Plaintiff:
Okiemute Omatie
Defendant:
S Thompson, Scott and Chapman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacoby v. McCoy et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00723
Plaintiff:
Brent William Jacoby
Defendant:
Christopher Gordy, Ms. Bibb, NP Ferrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berry et al v. Apple, Inc.
as 6:2021cv01379
Plaintiff:
Berry, Dana Berry, Emily Culver and others
Defendant:
Apple, Inc. and Apple Inc
Berry et al v. Apple, Inc.
as 1:2021cv00488
Plaintiff:
Dana Berry, Emily Culver, Lisa Shehee and others
Defendant:
Apple, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
