Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Robinson v. Stubblefield et al
as 4:2012cv01359
Plaintiff:
Darren Deterich Robinson
Defendant:
Gene Stubblefield, Charles Bryson, James W. Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. St. Louis Board of Police Commissioners et al
as 4:2012cv00107
Plaintiff:
Cedric M. Wright
Defendant:
St. Louis Board of Police Commissioners, Francis Slay, Jr., Thomas Irwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jonathan Smith v. Francis Slay, et al
as 11-3528
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jonathan G. Smith
Defendant - Appellee:
Francis G. Slay, Charles Bryson, Gene Stubblefield and others
Smith v. Slay et al
as 4:2011cv01671
Plaintiff:
Jonathan G. Smith
Defendant:
Francis G. Slay, Charles Bryson, Gene Stubblefield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharp v. Singer et al
as 4:2011cv01333
Plaintiff:
Robert Sharp
Defendant:
Susan Singer , Charles Bryson , Gene Stubblefield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Correctional Medical Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2011cv00143
Plaintiff:
Janet Denise Taylor
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Inc. , City of St. Louis, Missouri , Darius Daniel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dyer-El v. Torrence et al
as 4:2010cv02331
Petitioner:
Atiim-Enahara Dyer-El
Respondent:
Timothy Torrence, Steven R. Ohmer, Jennifer M. Joyce and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McGinnist v. Slay et al
as 4:2010cv01985
Plaintiff:
Dennis McGinnist
Defendant:
Frances Slay, Jerome Fielos, Reggie Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woolfolk v. Slay et al
as 4:2010cv01945
Plaintiff:
Orlando Woolfolk
Defendant:
Frances Slay, Reggie Moore, Jerome Fields and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. Nixon
as 4:2010cv01908
Plaintiff:
Maisha Imani Hamilton
Defendant:
Jeremiah "Jay" Nixon, Robin Carnahan, Mo Governor's Extradition Counsel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
