Cases 11 - 20 of 110
Hinton v. Cooper et al
as 5:2022ct03442
Plaintiff:
Charles Everette Hinton
Defendant:
Roy Cooper and State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles Hinton v. James Dever, III
as 22-6917
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES EVERETTE HINTON
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES C. DEVER, III, United States District Judge, PETER A. MOORE, Clerk of Court and UNITED STATES CORPORATION
Hinton v. Dever et al
as 5:2022ct03206
Plaintiff:
Charles Everette Hinton
Defendant:
James C. Dever, Peter A. Moore and United States Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Hinton v. Cooper et al
as 5:2022ct03183
Plaintiff:
Charles Everette Hinton
Defendant:
Roy Cooper, Eddie M. Buffaloe, State of North Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinton v. Jones et al
as 5:2022hc02067
Petitioner:
Charles Everette Hinton
Respondent:
Timothy P. Jones, Roy Cooper and NC Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hinton v. Cooper
as 5:2022ct03069
Plaintiff:
Charles Everette Hinton
Defendant:
Roy Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinton v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2021hc02206
Petitioner:
Charles Everette Hinton
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hinton v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2021hc02161
Petitioner:
Charles Everette Hinton
Respondent:
State of North Carolina and Timothy D. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hinton v. United States et al
as 5:2021ct03123
Defendant:
Robert Nordell, United States, Erik A. Hooks and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Everette Hinton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hinton v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2021hc02101
Petitioner:
Charles Everette Hinton
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
