Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Kelley v. Mims
as 1:2023cv02734
Petitioner:
Frederick D. Kelley
Respondent:
Warden Charles Mims
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KERCH v. FORD et al
as 5:2023cv00137
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP N KERCH
Defendant:
REGIONAL DIRECTOR BENJAMIN FORD, WARDEN CHARLES MIMS, DEPUTY WARDEN TONYA ASHLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KERCH v. FORD et al
as 1:2023cv00062
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP N KERCH
Defendant:
REGIONAL DIRECTOR BENJAMIN FORD, WARDEN CHARLES MIMS, DEPUTY WARDEN TONYA ASHLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Post v. Mims
as 1:2023cv01448
Petitioner:
Desmond Post
Respondent:
Warden Charles Mims
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BEY v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2023cv00086
Plaintiff:
ABDUL MALIK BEY
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TYRONE OLIVER, WARDEN CHARLES MIMS and WILCOX STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Post v. Mims et al
as 1:2023cv00522
Petitioner:
Desmond Post
Respondent:
Charles Mims and The Attorney General of the State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DUNSON v. SAMPSON et al
as 5:2022cv00319
Plaintiff:
Jerome Dunson and JEROME DUNSON, SR
Defendant:
GREGORY SAMPSON, TRACY JEFFERSON, MICHEAL THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mims et al v. MacPyles Corporation et al
as 2:2022cv00631
Plaintiff:
Charles Mims and Madria Mims
Defendant:
MacPyles Corporation and Robert Pyles
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
CARTER v. EMMONS et al
as 5:2021cv00327
Plaintiff:
DARANTAE CARTER
Defendant:
SHAWN EMMONS, CHARLES MIMS, CRUMBY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARTER v. EMMONS et al
as 7:2021cv00121
Plaintiff:
DARANTAE CARTER
Defendant:
WARDEN SHAWN EMMONS, DEPUTY WARDEN CHARLES MIMS, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER CRUMBY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
