Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Arroyo et al v. Express Courier International, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv00010
Plaintiff:
Carol Arroyo , Kacey Adams , Leke Adewunmi and others
Defendant:
Express Courier International, Inc. and EMP LSO Holding Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04926
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Perez v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
as 1:2017cv20061
Plaintiff:
Christina Perez
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Perez v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
as 6:2016cv02115
Plaintiff:
Christina Perez
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv06789
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Perez v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 6:2016cv00345
Defendant:
Director Brad Livingston, Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles, Texas Correctional Industries and others
Plaintiff:
Christina Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv03969
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02882
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02832
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Acuna et al v. United States Department of Agriculture et al
as 4:2016cv00271
Plaintiff:
Manuel Acuna , Eduviges Cordero , Jesus Flores and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture, Thomas J Vilsack, Joe Leonard and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
