Cases 11 - 20 of 61
City of Philadelphia v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 0:2022mc00012
Respondent:
Bank of America Corporation
Petitioner:
The City of Philadelphia
Plaintiff:
City of Philadelphia, Mayor of Baltimore, City Council of Baltimore and others
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A., Banc of America Securities LLC, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and others
Javelin Capital Markets LLC et al v. Bank Of America Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv03542
Defendant:
Bank Of America Corporation, ICAP Capital Markets LLC, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Javelin Capital Markets LLC and Javelin SEF, LLC
Interested Party:
The New York Times Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
The City of Philadelphia v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv04563
Plaintiff:
The City of Philadelphia
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Royal Bank of Scotland PLC and others
Interested Party:
The New York Times Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Public School Teachers' Pension and Retirement Fund of Chicago v. Bank Of America Corporation et al
as 1:2015cv09319
Defendant:
ICAP Capital Markets LLC., Citigroup Global Markets Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Public School Teachers' Pension and Retirement Fund of Chicago and Mayor and City Council of Baltimore
Interested Party:
The New York Times Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Tera Group, Inc. et al v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv02858
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Tera Group, Inc, Tera Advanced Technologies, LLC, TeraExchange, LLC and others
Interested Party:
The New York Times Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Board of Directors of the San Diego Association of Governments, acting as the San Diego County Regional Transportation Commission v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv04893
Defendant:
Citigroup Global Markets Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Wachovia Bank, N.A. and others
Plaintiff:
Board of Directors of the San Diego Association of Governments, acting as the San Diego County Regional Transportation Commission
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
OPENED IN ERROR
as 1:2021cv00605
Defendant:
Morgan Stanley Capital Services, LLC, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and others
Plaintiff:
New Mexico State Investment Council
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
In Re: Libor-Based Financial
as 20-1987
Plaintiff:
Lawrence W. Gardner, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, David Klusendorf, Axiom Investment Advisors Holdings L.P. and others
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Bank Dublin PLC, formerly known as Bear Stearns Bank PLC, Portigon/WestLB AG, Credit Suisse International and others
Defendant / Appellee:
BBA Libor, Ltd., Credit Suisse Group AG, Lloyds Bank PLC, FKA Lloyds TSB Bank PLC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
The Berkshire Bank, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and Government Development Bank for Puerto Rico
In Re: Bernard L. Madoff Inves
as 20-1333
Appellant:
Securities Investor Protection Corporation
Defendant / Appellee:
Citibank North America, Inc., Citigroup Global Markets Limited, Citibank, N.A. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Irving H. Picard, Trustee for the Substantively Consolidated SIPA Liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC and the Estate of Bernard L. Madoff
Amicus Curiae:
George W. Kuney, Ronald Mann, David Hague and others
Mayor and City Council of Baltimore v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv02667
Defendant:
Citigroup Global Markets Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Wachovia Bank, N.A. and others
Plaintiff:
Mayor and City Council of Baltimore
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
