Cases 11 - 20 of 73
Deemar v. Boad of Educaton of the City of Evanston/Skokie District 65 et al
as 1:2021cv03466
Defendant:
Devon Horton, Stacy Beardsley, LaTarsha Green and others
Plaintiff:
Stacy Deemar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00267
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
McHaney v. Cook et al
as 1:2020cv05331
Plaintiff:
Andrew McHaney
Defendant:
City of Evanston, Evanston Police Department and Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Velez et al
as 1:2020cv04482
Plaintiff:
Elijah Murphy
Defendant:
Luis Velez, Ryan Kleinpaste and City of Evanston Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson et al v. City of Evanston et al
as 1:2020cv02736
Plaintiff:
Andre Watkins, Kevin Nails, Jamir Johnson and others
Defendant:
Police Chief Demitrous Cook, City of Evanston and Demitrous Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ong v. United States et al
as 1:2020cv01550
Plaintiff:
Ong, Tristan Florendo and Babaylan
Defendant:
Cook County Inc., United States, City of Chicago and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Logan v. City Of Evanston et al
as 1:2020cv01323
Plaintiff:
Kevin Logan and Jamir Johnson
Defendant:
Demitrous Cook, Evanston Police Department and City Of Evanston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
James v. City Of Evanston et al
as 1:2020cv00551
Defendant:
Morton Grove Niles Water Commission and City Of Evanston
Plaintiff:
James Verzell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schwind v. City Of Evanston
as 1:2019cv05741
Plaintiff:
STEVEN SCHWIND
Defendant:
City Of Evanston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sterling et al v. Evanston Township High School District 202 et al
as 1:2019cv05599
Defendant:
Marvin Rhone, John Doe Evanston Officers (1-4), Michael Haywood and others
Plaintiff:
Sophia Sterling and Jorie Sterling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
