Cases 11 - 20 of 45
Maxon v. Officer Deleon et al
as 3:2022cv00368
Plaintiff:
Phillip Leslie Maxon
Defendant:
Officer Deleon and Officer Jones
Consolidated Defendant:
City of Murfreesboro Police Department and City of Murfreesboro, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Malone v. City of Murfreesboro et al
as 3:2021cv00218
Defendant:
Cody Thomas and City of Murfreesboro
Plaintiff:
Dormaricoh D. Malone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mullins v. City of Murfreesboro, et al.
as 3:2021cv00208
Defendant:
Officer John Doe, Officer Bill Doe, Chief Michael Bowen and others
Plaintiff:
Tina Mullins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00148
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winslow v. City of Murfreesboro, Tennessee et al
as 3:2019cv01124
Defendant:
Sam Smith and City of Murfreesboro, Tennessee
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Winslow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00832
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Malone v. Municipal Government of the City of Murfreesboro, Tennessee et al
as 3:2019cv00437
Plaintiff:
Maurice Montrell Malone
Defendant:
Municipal Government of the City of Murfreesboro, Tennessee, John Doe and Officer M. Mogoddham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01239
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00353
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
