Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Hickey v. Byrd et al
as 3:2021cv00086
Defendant:
Sergeant Dickey, Chief Bollenburg, Counselor Cude and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Hickey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamby v. Parker et al
as 3:2019cv00233
Defendant:
Ken Hutchinson, Michael Parris, Tony Parker and others
Plaintiff:
William D. Hamby, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Core Civic et al
as 2:2018cv02843
Defendant:
Core Civic, Case Manager Anderson and Counselor Bell
Plaintiff:
J. W. Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Keyes v. Swann et al
as 2:2018cv02478
Defendant:
R.N. Walton, Ms. Cunningham, A.W. Wilson and others
Plaintiff:
Darnell Alonzo Keyes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Federal Trade Commission v. Consumer Defense LLC et al
as 3:2018mc00002
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
Consumer Defense, LLC, Consumer Link, Inc, Preferred Law, PLLC and others
Hale v. State of Tennessee et al
as 1:2016cv00422
Plaintiff:
Thomas Daniel Eugene Hale
Defendant:
Tennessee State of, Bert Boyd, Darren L. Settles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seay v. All the Judges and P.D.s and D.A. et al
as 2:2015cv02407
Plaintiff:
Lloyd E. Seay
Defendant:
All the Judges and P.D.s and D.A., All Chaplains and Counselors, Grievance Comm. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. City of Memphis et al
as 2:2015cv02340
Plaintiff:
Larry T. Walker
Defendant:
City of Memphis, State of Tennessee, County of Shelby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hughes v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2014cv02502
Plaintiff:
Steven Alan Hughes
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Janssen, Shelby County Division of Corrections & Correct Care Solutions and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. Barrow et al
as 2:2008cv02277
Petitioner:
Watson Dixon, Jr.
Respondent:
John Barrow, Max Burn, Adam Toledano and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
