Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Cadwallader v. Devlin, Jr. et al
as 3:2015cv00139
Plaintiff:
Adrien Cadwallader
Defendant:
Richard J. Devlin, Jr., County of Otsego, Adam Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pacherille v. County of Otsego et al
as 3:2013cv01282
Plaintiff:
Tony Pacherille
Defendant:
County of Otsego , Town of Otsego , John Muehl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Souffrant v. The County of Otsego et al
as 3:2013cv00811
Plaintiff:
Patrick Souffrant
Defendant:
The County of Otsego, Sheriff Department, Michael Ten Eyck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pacherille v. County of Otsego et al
as 3:2013cv00789
Plaintiff:
Tony Pacherille
Defendant:
County of Otsego , City of Oneonta , City of Oneonta Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00868
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Forjone v. The State of California
as 10-822
Plaintiff:
Wayne Mack, Dan DelPlato, Jr., Gabriel Razzano and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
John-Joseph Forjone, the 42 USC 1983/Bivens/False Claims Act matter effecting the statewide distribution of HAVA funds requiring a 28 USC 2284 panel effecting New York Municipal People's equity in Bottom-up suffrage. Homerule autonomy and effecting real p
Defendant - Appellee:
The State of California, each by the Secretary of State and the Attorney General respectively, The State of Oregon, each by the Secretary of State and the Attorney General respectively, The State of New Mexico, each by the Secretary of State and the Attorney General respectively and others
Hogan v. A.O. Fox Memorial Hospital et al
as 3:2007cv00555
Plaintiff:
Loren Hogan
Defendant:
A.O. Fox Memorial Hospital, Charles Rocci, R. Ongjoco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
