Cases 11 - 20 of 22
McCray et al v. New York State et al
as 1:2013cv04766
Plaintiff:
Cerious McCray and Kimberly Casanova
Defendant:
New York State, State Commission of Correction (SCOC), Thomas A. Beilein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Koltun v. Berry et al
as 1:2013cv01612
Plaintiff:
Victor Koltun
Defendant:
Jeffrey Berry, B. Harold Ramsey, Aaron Weaver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reeder v. Allan et al
as 9:2010cv00959
Plaintiff:
Raszell Reeder
Defendant:
Allan, Dale Artus, Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. Merck Sharp & Dohme, Inc.
as 1:2010cv05789
Plaintiff:
Bonnie D. Phillips
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ruggiero v. Obama et al
as 9:2010cv00542
Petitioner:
Christopher Ruggiero
Respondent:
Barack Hussein Obama, Eric H. Holder, Channing D. Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv07381
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Coon v. Phillips et al
as 1:2009cv01619
Plaintiff:
Donald James Coon
Defendant:
Francis D. Phillips and NY State Police
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
County of Suffolk v. Golden Feather Smoke Shop, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv00162
Plaintiff:
County of Suffolk
Defendant:
Golden Feather Smoke Shop, Inc., Kimo Smoke Shop, Inc., Smoke and Rolls Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
The City of New York v. Golden Feather Smoke Shop, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv03966
Plaintiff:
The City of New York, The City of New York, The City of New York and others
Defendant:
Golden Feather Smoke Shop, Inc., Kimo Smoke Shop, Inc., Smoke and Rolls Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Phillips v. Merck & Co., Inc.
as 1:2008cv04142
Plaintiff:
Sue D. Phillips and Sue D. Phillips
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
