Cases 11 - 20 of 77
Raymond A. Green v. D. Samuel et al
as 2:2023cv06347
Plaintiff:
Raymond A. Green
Defendant:
D. Samuel, A. Sanchez, S. Rizo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robert McCullock v. D. Samuel
as 2:2023cv03322
Plaintiff:
Robert McCullock
Defendant:
Warden D. Samuel, B. Phillips, D. McAlister and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Allen v. Samuels, et al.
as 1:2023cv00503
Petitioner:
Clarence Allen
Respondent:
D. Samuels, California State Prison and the Attorney General of the State of California and Kamala D. Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
John Crawford v. D. Samuel
as 23-55397
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN CRAWFORD
Respondent / Appellee:
D. SAMUEL, Warden
Bobby Wilson v. D. Samuel et al
as 2:2023cv02330
Plaintiff:
Bobby Wilson
Defendant:
D. Samuel, Jane Doe and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walter Glenn Compton v. D. Samuel et al
as 2:2022cv08918
Plaintiff:
Walter Glenn Compton
Defendant:
D. Samuel and Attorney General Kamala D. Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aledo v. Samuel et al
as 3:2022cv07672
Petitioner:
Paul V. Aledo
Respondent:
Warden D. Samuel and C.M.C.S.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Samuel v. United Property and Casualty Insurance Co.
as 2:2023cv00050
Plaintiff:
Cynthia D. Samuel
Defendant:
United Property and Casualty Insurance Co.
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Derryl Ray Easter v. D. Samuel et al
as 2:2022cv07725
Plaintiff:
Derryl Ray Easter
Defendant:
D. Samuel and Mailroom Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Wong v. Samuel
as 2:2022cv01839
Petitioner:
Tjiak Wie Wong
Respondent:
D. Samuel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
