Cases 11 - 20 of 4,704
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv04988
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv04466
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
D.B. et al v. PFIZER INC et al
as 2:2016cv01438
Plaintiff:
D.B. and JULIE PARMLEY
Defendant:
PFIZER INC , PFIZER INTERNATIONAL INC., LLC , J.B. ROERIG & CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
M.W. et al v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA
as 2:2015cv05586
Plaintiff:
M.W. and D.B-W.
Defendant:
SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
D.B. v. FAIRVIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT
as 1:2015cv00085
Plaintiff:
D.B.
Defendant:
FAIRVIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
S.B. et al v. UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2013cv01463
Plaintiff:
S.B. , D.B. and NOLVIRA CURRY
Defendant:
UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Counter_claimant:
UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Counter_defendant:
NOLVIRA CURRY , D.B. and S.B.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Insurance Contract
Simmons v. Staff at USP-Coleman (2) et al
as 3:2012cv00807
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Simmons
Defendant:
Staff at USP-Coleman (2), K Cimock, Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Samuel et al
as 3:2012cv00524
Plaintiff:
Curtis L. Smith
Defendant:
Charles E. Samuel, Jr., FCI Allenwood, FCI Elkton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Alvarez v. Kranzel
as 3:2012cv00493
Petitioner:
Reuben A Alvarez, Jr.
Respondent:
D.B. Kranzel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DOWELL et al v. ALFA LAVAL INC et al
as 2:2011cv67705
Plaintiff:
BEVERLY DOWELL , MARK DOWELL and MELINDA MCMILLEN
Defendant:
ALFA LAVAL INC, ASBESTOS CORPORATION LTD, AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
