Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Smith v. Livingston
as 1:2016cv00091
Plaintiff:
David Wayne Smith
Defendant:
Brad Livingston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Dick Ware Unit et al
as 1:2016cv00079
Petitioner:
David Wayne Smith
Respondent:
Dick Ware Unit , B Williams, Texas Department of Criminal Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Dick Ware Unit et al
as 7:2016cv00115
Respondent:
Dick Ware Unit, L. Gonzales, Texas Department of Criminal Justice and others
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
David Wayne Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Compass Bank
as 3:2015cv02001
Defendant:
Compass Bank
Plaintiff:
David M Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Angeli et al v. Wilhelm et al
as 4:2014cv03286
Plaintiff:
James Angeli , Tiffany Armour , Reyes Avila and others
Defendant:
Ellen Wilhelm, David Maurice Smith, DWD Engineering, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Smith v. College of the Mainland et al
as 3:2013cv00307
Plaintiff:
David Michael Smith
Defendant:
College of the Mainland, Board of Trustees for College of the Mainland, Dr. Beth Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Smith v. Houston Pilots
as 4:2013cv00565
Plaintiff:
David A. Smith
Defendant:
Houston Pilots
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Smith v. Astrue
as 4:2012cv00625
Plaintiff:
David W Smith
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Schield v. Brawner et al
as 3:2012cv00197
Plaintiff:
Melvin Raymond Schield
Defendant:
James Brawner, Christopher Henken, Steven Greenwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. State of Texas
as 1:2011cv00651
Petitioner:
David Wayne Smith
Respondent:
State of Texas and Director Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
