Cases 11 - 20 of 103
CONLEY v. HEARD et al
as 1:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
KARRI MICHELLE CONLEY
Defendant:
DAVID LEE HEARD, ROBERT SEAN HOLDAWAY, SR, SALVATORE MIRANTI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mark Ward v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-10636
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARK DAVID WARD
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
WARD v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv19032
Plaintiff:
DAVID WARD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ward v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03511
Plaintiff:
David Ward
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Crowl et al v. Strongblock et al
as 1:2022cv07313
Plaintiff:
Erik Crowl, Keith Wade, Eric O'Reily and others
Defendant:
Strongblock, David C Moss, Brian Abramson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
PARSONS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv13725
Plaintiff:
DAVID WARD PARSONS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kane Family Ranch, LLC. v. United States Department of Agriculture et al
as 8:2022cv01226
Plaintiff:
Kane Family Ranch, LLC.
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture, Quail Creek Farms, Inc., David Ward, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Ward v. McDaniel et al
as 3:2022cv00035
Plaintiff:
David Ward
Defendant:
Robert McDaniel, Steve Ledbetter and City of Woodbury
WARD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv50945
Plaintiff:
DAVID WARD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WARD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv48607
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DAVID WARD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
