Cases 11 - 20 of 93
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00548
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661 Family Medical Leave Act
Dawson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2022cv00304
Plaintiff:
Cantrella Dawson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration and Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Campbell v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00402
Plaintiff:
Dawson Campbell
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dawson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv01756
Plaintiff:
Sue Dawson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Dawson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv03570
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Rosa Dawson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dawson v. United Association of Plumbers and Pipefitters (Local 189)
as 2:2021cv03478
Plaintiff:
Maryse LaRose Dawson
Defendant:
United Association of Plumbers and Pipefitters (Local 189)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fields v. Cincinnati Police Department et al
as 1:2021cv00035
Defendant:
Fath Properties, Citizen Complaint Authority, Cincinnati Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Fields
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dawson v. C.R. Bard Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv05321
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C.R. Bard Inc.
Plaintiff:
David Dawson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dawson v. Life Line Screening of America, Ltd., et al.
as 1:2020cv01810
Plaintiff:
Candice Dawson
Defendant:
Jessica Menapace and Life Line Screening of America, Ltd
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661 Family Medical Leave Act
Dawson v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv03610
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., CR Bard Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michelle Dawson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
