Cases 11 - 20 of 62
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00367
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Dawson v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (TV1)
as 1:2020cv00213
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Plaintiff:
Tanya Dawson
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Dawson v. Oak Ridge Police Department (PLR3)
as 3:2020cv00297
Defendant:
Oak Ridge Police Department, Oak Ridge Police Officers, Oak Ridge Methodist Medical Center Provider and others
Plaintiff:
Artaveus Dawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dawson v. Guy et al
as 3:2020cv00164
Defendant:
Tim Carver, Sheriff Joe Guy and McMinn County Sheriff Dept
Plaintiff:
Timothy M Dawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett et al v. Mays, et al
as 3:2019cv00473
Plaintiff:
Leviticus Dunlap, Terrance Simmons, Lesergio Wilson and others
Defendant:
Tony Mays and Kelly Hunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Dawson v. McMinn County Justice Center et al
as 1:2018cv00042
Plaintiff:
Timothy M. Dawson
Defendant:
McMinn County Justice Center, Joe Guy, Tim Carver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dawson v. Golden Service Realty & Auction, Inc.
as 1:2017cv01154
Plaintiff:
Hillard A Dawson
Defendant:
Golden Service Realty & Auction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Corum v. Tennessee Department of Correction et al
as 1:2017cv00074
Plaintiff:
Christopher Shane Corum
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Correction, Walter Stover, Kimberly Dawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dawson v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv01083
Plaintiff:
Lewis Y. Dawson, Jr.
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc. and Charlie Peterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
