Cases 11 - 20 of 36
HADDEN v. HERSHEY et al
as 1:2022cv01600
Plaintiff:
TREMAINE M HADDEN
Defendant:
RICHARD HERSHEY, JEFFREY LORMAN, ALISON AKKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DEW v. ELLIS et al
as 3:2022cv01136
Plaintiff:
JOHN DEW
Defendant:
CHARLES ELLIS, A+L MEDICAL DEPT., MRS. HUNTLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DEJESUS v. COUNTY OF MERCER et al
as 3:2021cv20233
Plaintiff:
PEDRO DEJESUS
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MERCER, BRIAN HUGHES, CHARLES ELLIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIS v. COUNTY OF MERCER et al
as 3:2021cv19403
Plaintiff:
CHARLES WILLIS
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MERCER, BRIAN HUGHES, WARDEN CHARLES ELLIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLORES v. CAMDEN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2021cv09120
Defendant:
DIRECTOR DAVID S OWENS, CORRECTIONS OFFICER BAILEY, SERGEANT TIFFANY DEANGELIS and others
Plaintiff:
CARMEN FLORES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOPEZ v. COUNTY OF SALEM et al
as 1:2019cv16653
Defendant:
DOES 1-10, LT. KATHY CRAWFORD, COUNTY OF SALEM and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN P. LOPEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DECAMBRE v. AVILES et als
as 2:2019cv04737
Defendant:
NURSE, ICE CARTAIN FASCE, DR. PARK and others
Plaintiff:
MARK DECAMBRE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TOBIN v. NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON et al
as 3:2016cv00799
Plaintiff:
FRANK S. TOBIN
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON, WARDEN OF NJSP IN 2014, DEPUTY WARDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SAMUELS v. SKRADZINSKI et al
as 1:2015cv07362
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN LAMAR SAMUELS
Defendant:
SKRADZINSKI, DEPUTY WARDEN, HEALTH DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GILBERT v. RITCHER et al
as 1:2012cv05133
Plaintiff:
JIHAD A. GILBERT
Defendant:
LT. RITCHER, DEPUTY WARDEN FOSSLER, DEPUTY WARDEN PIZZARO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
