Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Bonner et al v. Ada County et al
as 1:2018cv00058
Plaintiff: Michael Aaron Bonner, Detrick Curtis Conerly, Michael Griffith and others
Defendant: Ada County, Canyon County, IDOC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonner et al v. Conerly et al
as 1:2017mc09968
Plaintiff: Michael Aaron Bonner, Michael Griffith, Detrick Curtis Conerly and others
Defendant: United States of America, State of Idaho, Canyon County and others
Detrick C. Conerly v. Tom Wolf, et al
as 17-3394
Plaintiff - Appellant: DETRICK CURTIS CONERLY
Defendant - Appellee: TOM WOLF, KATHLEEN KANE and PARAN LLP
Griffith et al v. State of Idaho et al
as 3:2017cv05708
Plaintiff: Michael Griffith, Detrick Curtis Conerly, Michael Aaron Bonner and others
Defendant: State of Idaho and Paran LLP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CONERLY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017mc00019
Plaintiff: MICHAEL AARON BONNER, DETRICK CURTIS CONERLY and JOHN MENO CRUZ
Defendant: MS. KATHLEEN KANE, PARAN LLP and TOM WOLF
Conerly et al v. Wolf et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2016mc00004
Plaintiff: Detrick Curtis Conerly, Michael Aaron Bonner and John Cruz Meno
Defendant: Tom Wolf, Kathleen Kane and Paran LLP
Conerly v. United States of America et al
as 1:2016cv00351
Petitioner: Detrick Curtis Conerly
Respondent: United States of America, State of Idaho and Ada County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Conerly v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv00347
Plaintiff: Detrick Curtis Conerly
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Detrick Conerly v. USA
as 16-1879
Petitioner - Appellant: DETRICK CURTIS CONERLY
Respondent - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Conerly v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv00093
Plaintiff: Detrick Curtis Conerly
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?