Cases 11 - 20 of 100
Entropic Communications, LLC v. DISH Network L.L.C.
as 26-1352
Appellant:
ENTROPIC COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
Appellee:
DISH NETWORK L.L.C.
DISH Network L.L.C. v. Entropic Communications, LLC
as 26-1331
Appellant:
DISH NETWORK L.L.C., DIRECTV, LLC and ENTROPIC COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
DISH Network Corporation v. Smyrnov, et al.
as 26-109
Plaintiff:
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
Defendant:
VYACHESLAV SMYRNOV and VIRTUAL SYSTEMS, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv00719
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv18553
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Active Wireless Technologies LLC v. DISH Network Corp. et al
as 2:2025cv01172
Plaintiff:
Active Wireless Technologies LLC
Defendant:
DISH Network Corp., DISH Network LLC and DISH Wireless LLC d/b/a Boost Mobile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Dish Network L.L.C. v. Artistry Group, LLC et al
as 8:2025cv02846
Plaintiff:
Dish Network L.L.C.
Defendant:
Artistry Group, LLC doing business as 1 Dollar IPTV, Kemo E Marketing SDN. BHD., Noorhayati Binti Abdul Rahim and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Entropic Communications, LLC v. DISH Network L.L.C.
as 25-2145
Appellant:
ENTROPIC COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
Appellee:
DISH NETWORK L.L.C. and DIRECTV, LLC
Entropic Communications, LLC v. DISH Network L.L.C.
as 25-2147
Appellant:
ENTROPIC COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
Appellee:
DISH NETWORK L.L.C. and DIRECTV, LLC
SGCI Holdings III LLC, et al v. FCC, et al
as 25-5339
Plaintiff:
SGCI Holdings III LLC and Soohyung Kim
Defendant:
Federal Communications Commission, Brendan Thomas Carr, in his official capacity as Chairman of the FCC, Erin Boone, in her official capacity as Chief of the Media Bureau and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
