Cases 11 - 20 of 45
Gudger v. The State of Illinois et al
as 1:2019cv08286
Defendant:
Jovan J Gudger, John Baird, Kerry Donnelly and others
Plaintiff:
Lynwellyn H Gudger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rhodes v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2019cv06796
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Rhodes
Defendant:
Officer Donnelly, Star No. 13784, Officer Hernandez, Star No. 15925, Officer Wolinski, Star No. 2605 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Merritte v. Vescogni et al
as 1:2019cv03090
Defendant:
Kye Denault, Howard Chris Ryan, Jr., LaSalle County Circuit Court and others
Plaintiff:
Calvin L. Merritte
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nichols v. Moreland et al
as 1:2019cv02123
Defendant:
Christopher J. Donnelly, Kathyln Morrissey, Public Office and others
Plaintiff:
Demetrius H. Nichols
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02067
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Kiosk Promotions, Inc. v. Texas Wiz, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv01847
Plaintiff:
Kiosk Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Alexander Gregory, Jhonny Donnelly and Texas Wiz, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv06147
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Flynn et al v. Towne et al
as 1:2018cv00502
Plaintiff:
Matthew P. Flynn and Steven Pirro
Defendant:
Brian Towne, Karen Donnelly, Jeffrey Gaither and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wrona v. Thirteenth Judicial Circuit Court et al
as 1:2017cv04215
Petitioner:
Daryl Wrona
Respondent:
Thirteenth Judicial Circuit Court, H. Chris Ryan and Karen Donnelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jackson et al v. City of Bloomington et al
as 1:2017cv01046
Plaintiff:
Donnelly Jackson and Ashley Burrell
Defendant:
City of Bloomington, Bradley Massey, Aaron Veerman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
