Cases 11 - 20 of 256
ETIENNE v. SANDERS et al
as 1:2022cv02509
Defendant:
KAREN REA PERKINS, MACHELLE SANDERS, TAMMIE ELAINE HALL and others
Plaintiff:
DINEEN CHERYLANN ETIENNE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02392
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
O'FERRELL v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2022cv02179
Plaintiff:
CINDY-MAY O'FERRELL
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, MURIEL BOWSER, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GORBEY v. WILLIAMS et al
as 1:2022cv00088
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL OWL FEATHER GORBEY
Defendant:
WILLIAMS, FORREN, CRAWFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2021cv02786
Plaintiff:
DAN ALTSCHULD, MARK S AMATO, Cynthia MATSUMOTO and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
ALTSCHULD et al v. RAIMONDO et al
as 1:2021cv02779
Plaintiff:
DAN ET AL ALTSCHULD, DAN ALTSCHULD, MARK S AMATO and others
Not Classified By Court:
LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III, MERRICK B. GARLAND, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and others
Defendant:
Secretary GINA M. RAIMONDO and GINA M. RAIMONDO
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
YOUNG v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2021cv01985
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL KENNETH YOUNG
Defendant:
DAN JOHNSON and DAVID FARRELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MICHAEL KENNETH YOUNG v. YOUNG et al
as 1:2021cv01984
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL KENNETH YOUNG
Defendant:
DAN JOHNSON and DAVID W FARRELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
YOUNG v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2021cv01986
Petitioner:
MICHAEL KENNETH YOUNG
Respondent:
DAN JOHNSON and DAVID FARRELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SUN v. USCIS et al
as 1:2021cv01612
Defendant:
SARAH M. KENDALL, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, USCIS and others
Plaintiff:
Dan Sun
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
