Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Kinard v. Kelly et al
as 2:2012cv00489
Plaintiff:
Jordan Joseph Kinard
Defendant:
L. Kelly, J. Woodson, A. Fowlkes-Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shabazz v. Johnson et al
as 3:2012cv00282
Plaintiff:
Muwakkil Seifullah Bey Shabazz
Defendant:
Gene M. Johnson, Harold W. Clarke, John M. Jabe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bloom v. Jabe et al
as 7:2012cv00093
Plaintiff:
Daniel V.F. Bloom
Defendant:
Major C.D. Davis, Larry T. Edmonds, David B. Everett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
X v. United States Congress et al
as 3:2012cv00045
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Lee X
Defendant:
United States Congress, Virginia Department of Corrections, Harold E. Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
X v. United States Congress et al
as 3:2011cv00781
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Lee X
Defendant:
United States Congress, Virginia Department of Corrections, Harold E. Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Praveen Mandanapu v. David Everett
as 11-7344
Petitioner - Appellant:
PRAVEEN KUMAR MANDANAPU
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID B. EVERETT, Warden, Sussex II State Prison
Joseph Miles, III v. William Moore, III
as 11-6466
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH A. MILES, III
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM MOORE, III, Chaplain, Sussex II State Prison, DAVID B. EVERETT, Warden, Sussex II State Prison and DAVID ROBINSON, Regional Director, Eastern Regional Office
Myers v. Davis et al
as 3:2010cv00873
Plaintiff:
Deena Kaye Myers
Defendant:
Keith Davis, Clyde Alderman, Jerry Streat and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mandanapu v. Everett
as 1:2010cv01167
Petitioner:
Praveen Kumar Mandanapu
Respondent:
David B. Everett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ross v. Everett
as 3:2010cv00713
Petitioner:
Stanley L. Ross
Respondent:
David B. Everett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
