Cases 11 - 20 of 41
Dreves v. Dahlstrom et al
as 3:2019cv00270
Defendant:
Christopher Dietrich, Dean Marshall, Nancy Dahlstrom and others
Plaintiff:
David Cody Dreves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kone v. Williams
as 3:2019cv00246
Petitioner:
Tidiane Kone
Respondent:
Dean Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kone v. Williams
as 3:2019cv00230
Plaintiff:
Tidiane Kone
Defendant:
Dean Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tanadgusix Corporation et al v. Arm, Ltd.
as 3:2018cv00219
Plaintiff:
Jeanette Matthews, Benjamin English, Robert Dean Hughes and others
Defendant:
Arm, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith v. Cox et al
as 3:2018cv00216
Defendant:
John Cox and William Lapinskas
Plaintiff:
Billy Dean Smith, Josh Vars, Frostad Phoenix and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wagoner v. Williams et al
as 3:2018cv00211
Plaintiff:
Emalee R. Wagoner
Defendant:
Adam Rutherford, Laura Brooks, Robert T. Lawrence and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDonald et al v. Providence Alaska Medical Center et al
as 3:2018cv00159
Defendant:
Chris Swanson, St. Elias Specialty Hospital, The Hospitalist Group and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Dean McDonald and Heather Ann Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Dowl et al v. Williams et al
as 3:2018cv00119
Plaintiff:
Anas A. Dowl and Ernest A. Jacobsson
Defendant:
Dean Williams , Clare Sullivan , April Wilkerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Walker v. Alaska Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2018cv00036
Petitioner:
Jonathan Walker
Respondent:
Alaska Department of Corrections, William Walker, Jahna Lindemuth and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bently et al v. Williams et al
as 3:2018cv00003
Plaintiff:
Daniel Bently, Jacob Brown, Charles Brady and others
Defendant:
Dean Williams, Jeff Edwards and Kate Burkhart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
