Cases 11 - 20 of 194
Barclay v. Dixon
as 24-92
Defendant / Appellee:
MAKAYLA COOK, Police Officer, Sandusky Police Department, Heirs and Assigns D/B/A Makayla Cook, TIM MCCONAHAY, Warden, Mansfield Correctional Facility, Heirs and Assigns D/B/A Tim Mcconahay, ROBERT A. DIXON, Attorney, Attorney at Law, Heirs and Assigns D/B/A Robert A. Dixon and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LESHAWN MAURICE BARCLAY, a Moor beneficiary, a Emperor, Admiral, Mariner, Merchant, Piloter a private Moor aboriginal ohioan national, and subject of the Al Maroc Shereefian Empire
Kurt Kanam, et al v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 24-5003
Plaintiff:
Kurt Kanam, in his capacity as Chairman of the Pilchuck Nation and Pilchuck Nation
Defendant:
Debra A. Haaland, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, Bryan Newland, in his official capacity as Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of Indian Affairs, Darryl LaCounte, in his official capacity as Director, Bureau of Indian Affairs and others
Ifeji et al v. garland et al
as 1:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Jazzlyn Shabera Ifeji, Jazzlyn Shabera Ifeji Estate et al., Joseph Eddie Pryor Estate et al. and others
Defendant:
merrick garland attorney general et al., United States Department of Justice HEIRS AND ASSIGNS doing business as MERRICK GARLAND, andrew saul commissioner et al., Social Security Administration HEIRS AND ASSIGNS doing business as ANDREW SAUL, janet louise yellen secretary of the treasury et al., United States Department of the Treasury HEIRS AND ASSIGNS doing business as JANET LOUISE YELLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
JOHNSON et al v. HOLBROOK et al
as 2:2023cv05154
Plaintiff:
ANDRE LEMAURIO JOHNSON, AMUUR MATIYN ZAAKIR EL TRUST, ANDRE LEMAURIO JOHNSON ET AL and others
Defendant:
THOMAS HOLBROOK doing business as THOMAS HOLBROOK, ST. CLAIR COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY C HEIRS AND ASSIGNS, EZIKE NGO D/B/A EZIKE BGO: ILLINOIS DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC HEALTH HEIRS AND ASSIGNS doing business as EZIKE NGO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Center for Biological Diversity, et al v. DOI, et al
as 23-5308
Plaintiff:
Center for Biological Diversity, WildEarth Guardians, Citizens Caring for the Future and others
Defendant:
United States Department of the Interior, Debra A. Haaland, in her official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management and others
Intervenor:
Chevron U.S.A. Inc., OXY USA Inc, OXY USA WTP, LP and others
POWERS v. WEBB et al
as 2:2023cv04679
Plaintiff:
RACHEL GENEVIEVE POWERS
Defendant:
JEREMIAH DARNELL WEBB, NOAH SENCER ROBERT BARCLAY, MALAKAI LEVI LYNCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
motley v. JaNae Rocquel Motley Estate et al et al
as 1:2023cv10268
Plaintiff:
janae rocquel motley
Defendant:
JaNae Rocquel Motley Estate et al, Dymarion Rashad Brooks Estate et al, Derrion Rashad Brooks Estate et al and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
barclay et al v. dixon et al
as 1:2023cv10272
Plaintiff:
leshawn maurice barclay
Defendant:
webb, jeremiah darnell Estate et al, barclay, noah sencer robert Estate et al, lynch, malakai levi Estate et al and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Blueribbon Coalition Inc. v. Garland, et al.
as 4:2023cv00505
Plaintiff:
Blueribbon Coalition Inc
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Debra Haaland, Thomas Vilsack and others
Amicus Curiae:
Center for American Liberty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Twin Metals Minnesota LLC, et al v. USA, et al
as 23-5254
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Twin Metals Minnesota LLC and Franconia Minerals (US) LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, United States Department of the Interior, Debra A. Haaland, In her official capacity as Secretary of the Interior and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
Center for Biological Diversity, Ely Outfitting Company & Boundary Waters Guide Service, Freeman's Explore, LLC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
