Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Dempsey v. Sedgewick Claims Management Services Inc et al
as 4:2016cv01003
Plaintiff:
Brandon Dempsey
Defendant:
Sedgewick Claims Management Services Inc, Honda Leave and Disability Group and Honda Manufacturing of Alabama LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Dempsey v. Schiffman
as 7:2015cv00013
Plaintiff:
Timothy Dempsey
Defendant:
Karen Leslie Schiffman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dempsey v. Alabama, State of et al
as 2:2014cv02192
Petitioner:
Timothy J Dempsey
Respondent:
Alabama, State of and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hamilton v. Dempsey et al
as 1:2014cv01460
Plaintiff:
Shannon Hamilton
Defendant:
Gregory Scott Dempsey and The City of Childersburg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dempsey v. Bates et al
as 2:2013cv00467
Plaintiff:
Timothy Dempsey
Defendant:
Shane Bates, Patricia Bozeman, Leslie Schiffman and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Hale
as 5:2013cv00341
Plaintiff:
Dempsey Smith
Defendant:
Michael Hale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dempsey et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 2:2011cv01760
Plaintiff:
Mark A Dempsey , Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel and Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc, Defendant's Liaison Counsel and Defendant's Lead Counsel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv01394
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626
Dempsey v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 1:2010cv02529
Plaintiff:
Rita Dempsey
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Dempsey v. Alabama, State of et al
as 2:2010cv02188
Petitioner:
Timothy Dempsey
Respondent:
Alabama, State of and Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
