Cases 11 - 20 of 62
Harward et al v. City Of Austin et al
as 1:2021cv00095
Plaintiff:
Michael Gillette, David May, Jo Ann Wiersema and others
Defendant:
Austin Community College and City Of Austin
Petitioner:
Mark Mathias
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Young v. Aetna Life Insurance Company
as 4:2020cv01052
Defendant:
Aetna Life Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Dena Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv02039
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Branham v. Ganim et al
as 4:2019cv02251
Defendant:
Ibrahim S Ganim, Hop Restaurant, Inc. D/B/A House Of Pies, Shukri Mazen Ganim and others
Plaintiff:
Mary Ann Branham, Melissa Humphrey, Melissa Lovelady and others
Singleton et al v. Liberty County Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 3:2019cv00330
Plaintiff:
Dena Singleton, Jadarrius D. Buchanana and Jadarrius D Buchanana
Defendant:
Liberty County Mutual Insurance Company and Samuel D Groshans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00583
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stone v. James Allred Unit et al
as 4:2018cv02742
Defendant:
James Allred Unit, The Board of Pardon and Paroles, The Dispute Resolution and others
Plaintiff:
Alfred Lee Stone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01971
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Volk v. Four Brothers Ford Tractor Inc et al
as 3:2018cv01890
Plaintiff:
Dena Volk
Defendant:
Four Brothers Ford Tractor Inc and Russell Kelly
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
