Cases 11 - 20 of 85
JOHNSON v. JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF THE FIFTH CIRCUIT et al
as 1:2021cv02615
Plaintiff:
DERRICK JOHNSON
Defendant:
JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF THE FIFTH CIRCUIT and COMMITTEE ON JUDICIAL CONDUCT AND DISABILITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BYNOE et al v. MAYORKAS et al
as 1:2021cv00982
Plaintiff:
TINEY LYDIA DAVIS-BYNOE and DERRICK GODFREY BYNOE
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, TRACY RENAUD, MERRICK B. GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
DERRICK RUTLEDGE ABOUT FACE, LLC v. TROIKA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
as 1:2020cv03668
Plaintiff:
DERRICK RUTLEDGE ABOUT FACE, LLC, DRAF, LLC and DERRICK RUTLEDGE ABOUT FACE (DRAF), LLC
Defendant:
TROIKA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
GUIRLANDO v. COHEN et al
as 1:2020cv03490
Defendant:
UNION COUNTY JAIL, DERRICK DRISCOLL, DEANNA HOPSON and others
Plaintiff:
MARCO GUIRLANDO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIMMONS v. USA
as 1:2020cv01641
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
DERRICK W. SIMMONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01629
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01505
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01243
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAHARAKA v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2020cv01226
Defendant:
MARGNI, INC. EMPLOYEE #2, MARGNI, INC. EMPLOYEE #8, MARGNI, INC. EMPLOYEE #5 and others
Plaintiff:
THANDEKA-AKUA TAHARAKA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRECISION CONTRACTING SOLUTIONS, LP et al v. ANGI HOMESERVICES, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv02748
Plaintiff:
DERRICK S. SIEBER, CAROLYN TORSELL, STEPHEN C. SIEBER and others
Defendant:
ANGIE'S LIST, INC, KENNETH VOGEL, ANGI HOMESERVICES, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
