Cases 11 - 20 of 84
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03890
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Neff v. Commissioners of Schuylkill County Halcovage, Bender & Hess et al
as 3:2021cv00993
Defendant:
Sheriff Joseph Groody, President Judge Baldwin, District Attorney O'Pake and others
Plaintiff:
Keith D. Neff, Laura Johnson, Angelica Maready and others
Amicus Curiae:
Dillon Kamant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SAJUDIN et al v. STROUDSBURG AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
as 5:2021cv01743
Defendant:
COREY NAHF, RYAN PYSHER, STROUDSBURG AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT and others
Plaintiff:
DILLON SAJUDIN and DINO SAJUDIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jean v. Bucknell University et al
as 1:2020cv01722
Defendant:
National Fraternity of Kappa Delta Rho, Dillon Duttera, William C. Babcock and others
Plaintiff:
John Jean
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jean v. Bucknell University et al
as 4:2020cv01722
Defendant:
National Fraternity of Kappa Delta Rho, Dillon Duttera, William C. Babcock and others
Plaintiff:
John Jean
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00293
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BUTLER v. DJINDJIEV et al
as 5:2019cv06131
Defendant:
STEEL STONE ROAD HANOVER TOWNSHIP WHO WORKED OCTOBER 13TH - 14TH (3RD SHIFT), JOSH LEADBETTER, DILLON KOCH and others
Plaintiff:
PATRICK SEAN BUTLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AHNER v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv04937
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC, PENN CREDIT CORPORATION and EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.
Plaintiff:
DILLON AHNER
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Dillon III v. Munley et al
as 3:2019cv01216
Defendant:
Cory Conrad, John Munley, The City of Scranton and others
Plaintiff:
Vertis Dillon III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
