Cases 11 - 20 of 102
X1 Discovery, Inc. v. ASUSTeK Computer Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv10672
Plaintiff:
X1 Discovery, Inc.
Defendant:
ASUSTeK Computer Inc. and ASUS Computer International
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
X1 Discovery, Inc. v. Acer Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv10674
Plaintiff:
X1 Discovery, Inc.
Defendant:
Acer Inc. and Acer America Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
X1 Discovery, Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation
as 8:2023cv02415
Plaintiff:
X1 Discovery, Inc.
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Amarte USA Holdings, Inc. v. Bergdorf Goodman LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00883
Plaintiff:
Amarte USA Holdings, Inc.
Defendant:
Bergdorf Goodman LLC, T.J. Maxx, Inc., Marshalls of MA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
X1 Discovery, Inc. v. Dell Technologies Inc. et al
as 6:2023cv00872
Plaintiff:
X1 Discovery, Inc.
Defendant:
Dell Technologies Inc., Dell Products L.P. and Dell (Chengdu) Company Limited
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt v. Dr. Dre et al
as 2:2024cv00549
Defendant:
Neverland Rach, Wang Film Productions, Dr. Dre and others
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Home Box Office Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv09794
Plaintiff:
David Johnson
Defendant:
Home Box Office Inc., in the Southern, Northern, Eastern, Western, Districts of the States of New York, New Jersey, and Connecticut, HBO Entertainment inc., WARNER BROS. DISCOVERY INC. and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
John/Jane Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03526
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In re: Google Play Store Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2021md02981
Defendant:
Alphabet Inc., Google Payment Corp., Google Commerce Limited and others
Plaintiff:
Jared Stark, Ashly Esquivel, Robert Wing and others
Counter Defendant:
Epic Games, Inc., Match Group, LLC and Humor Rainbow, Inc.
Counter Claimant:
Google LLC and Google Asia Pacific PTE. Limited
Not Classified By Court:
Activision Blizzard, Inc., Niantic, Inc., Big Fish Games and others
Amicus Curiae:
American Antitrust Institute and Economists Supporting Dr. Rysman as Proposed Amici
3Rd Party Defendant:
Riot Games, Inc.
Interested Party:
Valve Corporation, Nintendo of America Inc., Police and Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit and others
Petitioner:
Amazon.com LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-12809
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
