Cases 11 - 20 of 51
Doe #6 v. Choice Hotels International, Inc. d/b/a Comfort Inn
as 4:2019cv04993
Defendant:
CHOICE HOTELS INTERNATIONAL, INC. d/b/a COMFORT INN and Choice Hotels International, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jane doe #6
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Day v. Hernandez et al
as 1:2019cv01183
Defendant:
John Doe #5, Shayna LNU, Dr. M. Burrows and others
Plaintiff:
Wynston Day
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Isa et al v. Shah et al
as 4:2019cv04459
Defendant:
Noorul Hassan, Syed Aminullah Hussaini, Syed Turab Shah and others
Plaintiff:
ICCMC and Nawaid Isa
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Coltart v. State of Texas, et al
as 6:2019cv00464
Defendant:
Thu Le, Olsson LNU, John Doe #5 and others
Plaintiff:
Alexander Scott Coltart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Doctor Freeman et al
as 4:2019cv01563
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe #5, John Doe #4 and others
Plaintiff:
Milton Leon Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reger v. Keller et al
as 1:2019cv00395
Defendant:
Attorney General Warren Kenneth Paxton, Jr., Presiding Judge Dean Rucker, Landon A. Wade and others
Plaintiff:
Russell Jay Reger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robbins v. Does 1-10
as 1:2018mc00647
Defendant:
Baylor University
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 10, Jane Doe 2 and others
Respondent:
Jane Does 1-10
Movant:
William K. Robbins, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Robbins v. Does 1-10
as 6:2018mc00219
Defendant:
Baylor University
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 10, Jane Doe 2 and others
Respondent:
Jane Does 1-10
Movant:
William K. Robbins, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Cole v. Max Mahan Company, Inc., et al
as 1:2017cv01014
Plaintiff:
Sharon Cole
Defendant:
John Doe 1 through John Doe 5, John Doe 6 through John Doe 10 and Max Mahan Company Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Kharb, Praveen v. Ericsson, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv00619
Plaintiff:
Praveen Kharb
Defendant:
Ericsson Inc, John Doe 1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
