Cases 11 - 20 of 25
CELL FILM HOLDINGS, LLC v. JOHN DOES 1-8
as 2:2016cv04879
Plaintiff:
CELL FILM HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-8
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Alex v. Barkley et al
as 1:2015cv00754
Plaintiff:
Anthony Joseph Alex, I
Defendant:
Kimberly A. Barkley and John Does 1 - 8
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TOLLOIVER et al v. LICIARDELLO et al
as 2:2015cv00095
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIUS TOLLOIVER and JOHN SULLIVAN
Defendant:
THOMAS LICIARDELLO, JOSEPH MCCLOSKEY, MICHAEL SPICER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DENT v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2014cv00036
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW DENT
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , SCOTT CYPRIAN and JOHN DOES 1-8
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GONZALES v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2013cv07223
Plaintiff:
VICTOR GONZALES
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , NELSON LEON and POLICE OFFICERS JOHN/JANE DOE 1-8
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GILL v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2013cv06997
Plaintiff:
SIMON GILL
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MICHAEL J. EDINGER and POLICE OFFICERS JOHN/JANE DOE 1-8
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CRISWELL et al v. SHALLOW CREEK KENNELS, INC et al
as 2:2013cv01598
Plaintiff:
ERIC CRISWELL and HEDY CRISWELL
Defendant:
SHALLOW CREEK KENNELS, INC and JOHN DOES 1-8
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PORTER GERALD et al v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2013cv03000
Plaintiff:
ANGELIQUE C. PORTER GERALD , TAFARI GERALD and IMANI GERALD
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER , IAN NANCE , DARNELL JESSIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DANIELS v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2012cv01631
Plaintiff:
HARVEY W. DANIELS
Defendant:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH , COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY, ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MALIBU MEDIA, LLC v. JOHN DOES 1-8
as 2:2012cv03144
Plaintiff:
MALIBU MEDIA, LLC
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-8
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
