Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Coffman v. Dolgencorp LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00297
Defendant:
John Doe Companies, Dollar General Corporation and Dolgencorp LLC doing business as Dollar General
Plaintiff:
Jearl E Coffman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Rogers v. Dollar General Corporation et al
as 4:2020cv00305
Defendant:
RFEC IV Investments LLC, John Does, Dollar General Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa Renae Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hutton v. Dollar General Corporation et al
as 5:2019cv05086
Defendant:
John Does 1-5, Dollar General Corporation and Dollar General Corporation doing business as Dollar General No. 13293
Plaintiff:
Jim L. Hutton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin v. Dollar General Corporation
as 4:2016cv04053
Plaintiff:
LaSharen Martin
Defendant:
Dollar General Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wait v. Dollar General Corporation et al
as 5:2016cv05036
Plaintiff:
Matthew Wait
Defendant:
Dollar General Corporation and Dolgencorp, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv00284
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00581
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Dolgencorp, LLC et al
as 3:2012cv03128
Plaintiff:
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Defendant:
Dolgencorp, LLC and Dollar General Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00232
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
