Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Donald Fisher v. J. Hartley
as 11-16553
Petitioner - Appellant:
DONALD FISHER
Respondent - Appellee:
J. D. HARTLEY, Warden
Donald Fisher v. J. Hartley
as 11-15488
Petitioner - Appellant:
DONALD FISHER
Respondent - Appellee:
J. D. HARTLEY, Warden
Donald Fisher v. J. Hartley
as 11-15188
Petitioner - Appellant:
DONALD FISHER
Respondent - Appellee:
J. D. HARTLEY, Warden
Fisher v. Hartley
as 1:2009cv01990
Petitioner:
Donald Fisher
Respondent:
J.D. Hartley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fisher et al v. Knauf Gips KG et al
as 2:2009cv03927
Plaintiff:
Donald Fisher, Donald Fisher, Donald Fisher and others
Defendant:
Knauf Gips KG, Knauf Plasterboard Tianjin Co., Ltd., Taishan Gypsum Co. Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Blalock et al v. Interior Exterior Building Supply LP et al
as 2:2009cv03608
Plaintiff:
Angeles P. Blalock, Angeles P. Blalock, Angeles P. Blalock and others
Defendant:
Interior Exterior Building Supply LP, Interior Exterior Building Supply LP and Interior/Exterior Enterprises, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Fisher v. Hartley
as 1:2009cv00720
Petitioner:
Donald Fisher
Respondent:
J.D. Hartley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garnier v. Fisher et al
as 4:2008cv02881
Plaintiff:
Jonah Gabriel Garnier
Defendant:
Donald Fisher, Henry McKenzie, Marin County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv02144
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Fisher v. Harrah's Lake Charles, L.L.C. et al
as 9:2007cv00148
Plaintiff:
Donald Fisher
Defendant:
Harrah's Lake Charles, L.L.C. and Harrah's Marketing Services Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
