Cases 11 - 20 of 32
LIU et al v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
as 2:2018cv04900
Plaintiff:
LI HUA LIU, XUE XIU LIU, GUANG ZHONG LI and others
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAN v. ODDO
as 2:2018cv01413
Defendant:
WARDEN J. ODDO
Petitioner:
DONG PYOU HAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CHANG et al v. EASTERN UNIVERSITY et al
as 2:2018cv03215
Defendant:
RUTGERS COMMUNITY CHRISTIAN CHURCH and EASTERN UNIVERSITY
Plaintiff:
DONG XIA CHANG and PETER C. CHANG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00546
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 070
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv04052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
DONAHUE et al v. BAYER, CORP. et al
as 2:2016cv03710
Plaintiff:
KRYSTAL DONAHUE , BRIANA DONG , BELINDA DRIVER and others
Defendant:
BAYER, CORP. , BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC , BAYER ESSURE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Liu v. BJW LLC et al
as 1:2016cv00430
Plaintiff:
Dong Chang Liu
Defendant:
BJW LLC , Judy Wu and John and Jane Doe #1-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
SHIN v. PARK
as 2:2014cv05558
Plaintiff:
DONG HONG SHIN
Defendant:
CHANG Y. PARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CHINA MAX INC. et al v. SOUTH HILLS CN LLC et al
as 1:2014cv00211
Plaintiff:
CHINA MAX INC. and DE DONG ZHENG
Defendant:
SOUTH HILLS CN LLC, ROSS PARK CC LLC, JING ZHU and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S SUBSCRIBING TO POLICE NO. BSA-38990 v. DONG et al
as 2:2014cv03413
Plaintiff:
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S SUBSCRIBING TO POLICE NO. BSA-38990
Defendant:
SHENG DONG and SHAO YUN DONG
Counter_claimant:
SHAO YUN DONG and SHENG DONG
Counter_defendant:
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S SUBSCRIBING TO POLICE NO. BSA-38990
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
