Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Michael Forrest v. Michael Overmyer, et al
as 15-2613
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL FORREST
Defendant:
MD ABRAHAM, MD AMANDA, MD JEFFREY BEARD and others
PRICE v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2014cv00230
Plaintiff:
CURTIS PRICE
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN WETZEL, KENNETH CAMERON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Stuart v. Lisiak et al
as 1:2014cv01401
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Stuart
Defendant:
Lisiak, Tony Inuzzi, Karen Holly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Forrest v. Debra Sauers, et al
as 13-1389
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL FORREST
Defendant - Appellee:
DEBRA K. SAUERS, MAURIN, JOHN DOE 1 and others
FORREST v. SAUERS et al
as 1:2012cv00319
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL FORREST
Defendant:
DEBRA K. SAUERS, MAURIN, JOHN DOE 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Forrest v. Nedab, et al
as 12-3939
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL FORREST
Defendant - Appellee:
NEDAB, HORN, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
In Re: Michael Forrest, et al
as 12-2246
Petitioner:
MICHAEL FORREST
Respondent:
NEDAB, HORN, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
FORREST v. NEDAB et al
as 2:2011cv07773
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL FORREST
Defendant:
NEDAB, HORN, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. PRESIDENT AND CEO OF PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv07935
Plaintiff:
ALTON D. BROWN
Defendant:
PRESIDENT AND CEO OF PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INC., FELIPE ARIAS, J. SCOTT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. President and CEO of Prison Health Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv01939
Plaintiff:
Alton D. Brown
Defendant:
President and CEO of Prison Health Services, Inc., Felipe Arias, J. Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
