Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Hedgespeth, Raymond v. Bellile, Doug et al
as 3:2020cv00361
Defendant:
The Sand Ridge Secure Treatment Center, Lisa Poulie and Doug Bellile
Plaintiff:
Raymond K. Hedgespeth, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Stojanovic, Peter v. Bellile, Doug et al
as 3:2019cv00729
Defendant:
Daniel Kattenbraker, Michelle Finger, Lori Fox and others
Plaintiff:
Peter Stojanovic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenneth Jaworski v. Doug Bellile
as 19-1508
Respondent / Appellee:
DOUG BELLILE
Petitioner / Appellant:
KENNETH JAWORSKI
Gadzinski, Philip v. Bellile, Doug et al
as 3:2019cv00339
Plaintiff:
Philip J. Gadzinski
Defendant:
Mitch Linski, Alicia Borhme and Doug Bellile
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matthew Tyler v. Doug Bellile
as 19-1049
Petitioner / Appellant:
MATTHEW TYLER
Respondent / Appellee:
DOUG BELLILE
Maher, Scott v. Wisconsin Dept. Health & Human Services et al
as 3:2018cv01061
Plaintiff:
Scott Maher
Defendant:
Doug Bellile, Sand Ridge Secure Treatment Center and Wisconsin Dept. Health & Human Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Neubecker, Jeffrey v. Wisconsin Dept. Health & Human Services et al
as 3:2018cv00876
Defendant:
Charlie Saunders, Wisconsin Dept. Health & Human Services, Sand Ridge Secure Treatment Center (SRSTC) and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Neubecker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jaworski v. Bellile
as 2:2017cv01757
Petitioner:
Kenneth W Jaworski
Respondent:
Doug Bellile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Richard, Herbert v. Department of Health Services et al
as 3:2017cv00720
Plaintiff:
Herbert O. Richard
Defendant:
Department of Health Services , Sandridge Secure Treatment Center, Kitty Rhoades and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Milton Taylor v. Doug Bellile
as 17-2297
Petitioner - Appellant:
MILTON W. TAYLOR
Respondent - Appellee:
DOUG BELLILE, Administrator of Sand Ridge Secure Treatment Center
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
