Cases 11 - 20 of 45
Michael Key, et al v. Morehouse College, et al
as 21-10043
Defendant / Appellant:
QUISHA BUGGS, individually, and as Resident Advisor for Morehouse College, MICHAEL HODGES, SHAWN MOORE, individually, and as Associate Coordinator of Resident Education and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2 and MICHAEL KEY
HALL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv89672
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
LANDON DOUGLAS HALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hall v. LMDC et al
as 3:2020cv00292
Defendant:
F. Brist, W. Huff, LMDC and others
Plaintiff:
Bobbye JaQuil Douglas Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burge v. Pattern Energy Group Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00213
Defendant:
Richard Goodman, Patricia Newson, Michael Garland and others
Plaintiff:
Phil Burge
Frieman v. Pattern Energy Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00171
Defendant:
Michael Garland, Pattern Energy Group, Inc., Richard Goodman and others
Plaintiff:
David Frieman
Thompson v. Pattern Energy Group Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv02369
Defendant:
Patricia Newson, Michael Garland, John Browne and others
Plaintiff:
John Thompson
Donnell v. Pattern Energy Group, Inc et al
as 1:2019cv11680
Defendant:
Mona Sutphen, Michael Garland, Alan Batkin and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Donnell
Hall v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv01235
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
James Douglas Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gordenstein et al v. Kingdom Of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11941
Plaintiff:
Gregory Hrycak, Rozelda Bailey-Green, Christine Buividas and others
Defendant:
Kingdom Of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333
Kim et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran
as 1:2018cv11870
Plaintiff:
Andrea Stauter, Dawn Gonzalez, Rozelda Bailey-Green and others
Defendant:
Islamic Republic of Iran
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
