Cases 11 - 18 of 18
WILLIAMS v. DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
as 2:2012cv04769
Plaintiff:
ERIC WILLIAMS
Defendant:
DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
WILLIAMS v. DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2012cv00850
Plaintiff:
JEREMY WILLIAMS
Defendant:
DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BASS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICE et al
as 2:2011cv01071
Plaintiff:
RONALD BASS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, INSPECTOR GENERAL OFFICES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
HSIA v. U.S. DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
as 2:2011cv00505
Plaintiff:
VINCENT HSIA
Defendant:
U.S. DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355
ARAROMI et al v. MIDDLE TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2010cv01048
Plaintiff:
OLUTOYIN A. ARAROMI and SHAYE S. ARAROMI
Defendant:
MIDDLE TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT, CHRISTOPHER LEUSNER, MIDDLE TOWNSHIP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
DASTECH INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al v. GONZALES et al
as 3:2007cv05690
Plaintiff:
DASTECH INTERNATIONAL, INC. and DASTECH INDUSTRIES, LTD.
Defendant:
ALBERTO GONZALES, KAREN P. TANDY and DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 0348
DASTECH INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al v. GONZALES et al
as 2:2007cv05690
Plaintiff:
DASTECH INTERNATIONAL, INC. and DASTECH INDUSTRIES, LTD.
Defendant:
ALBERTO GONZALES, KAREN P. TANDY and DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 0348
DASTECH INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al v. GONZALES et al
as 2:2007cv05690
Plaintiff:
DASTECH INTERNATIONAL, INC. and DASTECH INDUSTRIES, LTD.
Defendant:
ALBERTO GONZALES, KAREN P. TANDY and DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 0348
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
