Cases 11 - 20 of 90
Duke et al v. A.R.D. Express, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00064
Plaintiff:
Juan Duke and Linda Lymon
Defendant:
A.R.D. Express, Inc. and Ion Razvan
Interested Party:
Shelter Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. Rettig et al
as 3:2021cv00750
Plaintiff:
Andre Lemaurio Johnson
Defendant:
Charles Rettig, Trey Hargett, Janet Yellen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thurman v. Duke et al
as 2:2021cv00148
Plaintiff:
James W Thurman
Defendant:
Williamt Duke, Greg Earps, McMinn County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee et al v. Cox et al
as 3:2021cv00653
Plaintiff:
Martha Arnita Lee and Bennie Lee
Defendant:
Jackie Cox, Glenn G. Dukes, Brandon McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Al-Kaysani v. Lieberman et al
as 1:2021cv01096
Plaintiff:
Sadiq Al-Kaysani and Christopher Kennon
Defendant:
Brian Duke, Joseph Lieberman, Angela R. Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen et al v. Hardeman Co., TN, Gov.
as 1:2021cv01087
Plaintiff:
Jackie Kelley, Cody Naylor, Toni Pierce and others
Defendant:
Hardeman County, Tennessee, Government and Jimmy Sain
Al-Kaysani v. Duke et al
as 1:2021cv01070
Defendant:
Joseph Lieberman, Bill Lee, Steve Bill and others
Plaintiff:
Sadiq Al-Kaysani
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KGS Steel Inc v. McCandless et al
as 3:2020cv00911
Plaintiff:
KGS Steel Inc
Counter Plaintiff:
Houston McCandless
3Rd Party Defendant:
Gaston Stein
Defendant:
Bentley Steel Inc and Randall A Duke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Duke v. Taylor et al
as 1:2020cv00065
Plaintiff:
Brian E. Duke
Defendant:
Ted Baltimore, Megan Taylor, Brandon Refit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Henderson County et al
as 1:2020cv01221
Defendant:
Jackie Bausman, Henderson County and Brian Duke
Plaintiff:
Gerald T. Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
