Cases 11 - 20 of 94
Rogers et al v. Badmus et al
as 4:2021cv02185
Plaintiff:
Aaron Michael Rogers and Kameron Sorrows
Defendant:
Taofeekat O Badmus, Bobby Lumpkin and Allison Dunbar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gantt, et al. v Colonial National Mortgage
as 3:2021cv00141
Plaintiff:
Daniel Wayne Gantt and Heather Lynn Dunbar Gantt
Counter Plaintiff:
Colonial National Mortgage, a Division of Colonial Savings, F.A.,
Defendant:
Colonial National Mortgage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rogers et al v. Badmus et al
as 4:2021cv01878
Defendant:
Taofeekat O Badmus, Allison Dunbar and Bobby Lumpkin
Plaintiff:
Aaron Michael Rogers and Chris Lahman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burley v. Knox et al
as 6:2021cv00121
Defendant:
Sgt Unknown Byrd, Major Unknown Ragsdale, Sgt Unknown Dunbar and others
Plaintiff:
Eldrick Burley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harward et al v. City Of Austin et al
as 1:2021cv00095
Plaintiff:
Michael Gillette, David May, Jo Ann Wiersema and others
Defendant:
Austin Community College and City Of Austin
Petitioner:
Mark Mathias
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wiley v. Dunbar et al
as 6:2020cv01059
Defendant:
Aaron Moon, Scott Sinsabaugh, Jennine Jarolik and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Bernard Wiley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Summers v. Paxton et al
as 1:2020cv00425
Defendant:
Alonzo W Turner, Vickie Barrow, Bryan Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Leon Summers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grant v. Jackson et al
as 9:2020cv00188
Defendant:
David B Lee, Michael L Herrington, Leroy Jackson and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Grant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00681
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01359
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
