Cases 11 - 20 of 42
TODD v. SIX UNKNOWN NAMED AGENTS OF FEDERAL BUREAU OF NARCOTICS ET AL
as 5:2017cv00059
Plaintiff:
JEROME EUGENE TODD
Defendant:
SIX UNKNOWN NAMED AGENTS OF FEDERAL BUREAU OF NARCOTICS, MAURICE M PAUL, ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carlton Strother v. B. Blackmon
as 16-60539
Petitioner - Appellant:
CARLTON PHAROAH STROTHER
Respondent - Appellee:
B. E. BLACKMON, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution Yazoo City Low
Carter v. Blackmon
as 3:2016cv00565
Plaintiff:
Quitman Carter
Defendant:
B. E. Blackmon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Mitchell v. Blackmon
as 3:2016cv00556
Plaintiff:
Curtis Eugene Mitchell
Defendant:
B. E. Blackmon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Strother v. Blackmon
as 3:2016cv00463
Plaintiff:
Carlton Pharoah Strother
Defendant:
B. E. Blackmon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Blackmon v. Janssen Research & Development LLC f/k/a Johnson and Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development LLC et al
as 2:2016cv10129
Plaintiff:
Don E. Blackmon
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wooten v. Blackmon et al
as 3:2016cv00446
Plaintiff:
Ronald Edward Wooten
Defendant:
B. E. Blackmon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Colon v. Blackmon
as 3:2016cv00440
Plaintiff:
Luis Daniel Colon
Defendant:
B. E. Blackmon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Thomas v. Blackmon
as 3:2016cv00416
Plaintiff:
Alvin M. Thomas
Defendant:
B. E. Blackmon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Arndt et al v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2016cv05886
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Bruce J Arndt , Don E. Blackmon , Rose Cuahonte and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
