Cases 11 - 20 of 108
Black-Stiles v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2022pq00926
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Mary E. Black-Stiles
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Chevron U.S.A. Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Moreland v. McCoy
as 21-40826
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Carlos M. Moreland
Defendant / Appellee:
Don'Shay McCoy, Hep C Specialist Physician, Dr. Lannette Linthicum, Supervisor Hep. C. Clinic Protocol, Hep. C. Clinic Treatment Committee, Kirk D. Abbott, co-chair of the Correctional Managed Health Care Committee-Joint Infection Control Committee and others
Flores v. Black et al
as 4:2021cv03551
Plaintiff:
Mirna Lorena Argueta Flores
Defendant:
Sarah E. Black and Cindy L. Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Daniels v. Saucedo
as 21-50996
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Melvin B. Daniels
Defendant / Appellee:
Attorney Israel Saucedo, Barrett Daffin Frappier, Turner & Engel, L.L.P. and others
Daniels v. Saucedo et al
as 7:2021cv00101
Defendant:
Barrett Daffin Frappier, Attorney Israel Saucedo, Trustee Thomas E. Black, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Melvin B. Daniels
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
United States v. Black
as 20-3199
Defendant / Appellant:
DARRELL E. BLACK
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
(PC) Hill v. Perez et al
as 4:2020cv06557
Defendant:
E. Perez, E Black, J. Beltran and others
Plaintiff:
Cymeyon Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Hill v. Perez et al
as 2:2020cv01810
Defendant:
E. Perez, E. Black, J. Beltran and others
Plaintiff:
Cymeyon Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Black et al
as 4:2020cv05900
Defendant:
N. Leach, Agustine, R. Borrego and others
Plaintiff:
Cymeyon Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Hill v. Black et al
as 2:2020cv01657
Defendant:
E. Black, N. Leach, Agustine and others
Plaintiff:
Cymeyon Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
