Cases
Cases 11 - 19 of 19
MOORE v. MULLIGAN et al
as 3:2012cv00214
Plaintiff: ANDY MOORE
Defendant: EDWARD MULLIGAN, SUE DARR, SUPERINTENDENT ROZUM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Dante Burton v. Gerald Rozum, et al
as 10-1515
Plaintiff - Appellant: DANTE BURTON
Defendant - Non-Participating: GERALD ROZUM, DANIEL GEHLMANN, MCNELIS and others
BURTON v. SUPERINTENDENT GERALD L. ROZUM et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv00324
Plaintiff: DANTE BURTON
Defendant: SUPERINTENDENT GERALD L. ROZUM, MAJOR DANIEL J. GEHLMANN, UNIT MANAGER EDWARD MULLIGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaun Wright v. PA Dept Corr, et al
as 09-4323
Plaintiff - Appellant: SHAUN WRIGHT
Defendant - Appellee: PA DEPT CORR, DONNA VARNER, WILLIAMS and others
WRIGHT v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2009cv00262
Plaintiff: SHAUN WRIGHT
Defendant: PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DONNA VARNER, TRACY WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
William Rawls v. PA Dept Corr, et al
as 09-1583
Plaintiff - Appellant: WILLIAM RAWLS
Defendant - Appellee: PA DEPT CORR, BD PROBATION PAROLE, JEFFREY BEARD and others
William Rawls v. Comm of PA, et al
as 08-4003
Plaintiff - Appellant: WILLIAM RAWLS
Defendant: COMM OF PA, RICK ZERAMBO, KARREN GLADDNEY and others
Defendant - Nominal Respondent: GERALD ROZUM
William Rawls v. Comm of PA, et al
as 08-4002
Plaintiff - Appellant: WILLIAM RAWLS
Defendant: COMM OF PA, RICK ZERAMBO, KARREN GLADDNEY and others
Defendant - Nominal Respondent: GERALD ROZUM
RAWLS v. THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2008mc00061
Plaintiff: WILLIAM RAWLS
Defendant: THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, RICK ZERAMBO, KARREN GLADDNEY and others
Cause Of Action: Petition for Review

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?