Cases 11 - 20 of 427
SOLOMON v. BEAVER COUNTY et al
as 2:2022cv01491
Plaintiff:
IMANI SOLOMON
Defendant:
BEAVER COUNTY, WILLIAM J. SCHOUPPE, ETHEL WHITE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennett v. Barber et al
as 3:2022cv00413
Plaintiff:
Corey Alan Bennett
Defendant:
Stacy Barber, Tammy Zook, William Bechtold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DENT v. MORRIS et al
as 5:2022cv00756
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WILSON DENT
Defendant:
TIMOTHY J. MORRIS, DARREN SMITH, YISLEIDY D. MINAYA-VARGAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bennett v. Wallace et al
as 3:2022cv00279
Plaintiff:
Corey Alan Bennett
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Wallace, Lt. Elliot and Lt. Schaffer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennett v. Arter et al
as 3:2021cv01907
Plaintiff:
Corey Bennett
Defendant:
Lt. Arter, Warden William Bechtold, Deputy Warden Jeff Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Algofi et al v. Koninklijke Philips N.V. et al
as 2:2021cv01477
Plaintiff:
Sebe Algofi, Brian Caswell, Eliza Reid and others
Defendant:
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V, PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC and PHILIPS R.S. NORTH AMERICA, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Endrikat v. Ransom et al
as 1:2021cv01684
Plaintiff:
Robert Endrikat
Defendant:
Ransom, George Miller, J Cirelli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ELLIOT v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2021cv01420
Petitioner:
MATTHEW ELLIOT
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HAYNES v. DECANINI et al
as 2:2021cv00079
Defendant:
DPTY. WARDEN WHITE, LT. CIPOLLA, C/O HERMAN and others
Plaintiff:
PATRICK HAYNES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
ROMAN v. PHILLIPS & COHEN ASSOCIATES, LTD.
as 2:2020cv06288
Defendant:
PHILLIPS & COHEN ASSOCIATES, LTD.
Plaintiff:
ELLIOT ROMAN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
