Cases 11 - 20 of 29
ENGLISH v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2017cv02534
Petitioner:
STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF OKLAHOMA and others
Amicus Curiae:
STENY HOYER, BRAD SHERMAN, ELIZABETH WARREN and others
Defendant:
JOHN MICHAEL MULVANEY, DONALD JOHN TRUMP and DONALD J. TRUMP
Plaintiff:
LEANDRA ENGLISH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
ENGLISH v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2016cv02335
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Plaintiff:
CHIMWALA F. ENGLISH
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
WARD v. ENGLISH et al
as 1:2016cv02276
Plaintiff:
LUCAS LEE WARD
Defendant:
DANIEL ENGLISH, MELLETE, M. ANDERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00446
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
STEWART v. E.S. INVESTMENT, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv00495
Defendant:
E.S. INVESTMENT, INC., WHOLE SALE REAL ESTATE, LLC and ANEAKA ENGLISH
Plaintiff:
ROBERT STEWART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ENGLISH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2015cv00225
Plaintiff:
MARGARET ENGLISH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2401
ENGLISH v. USA
as 1:2015cv00006
Petitioner:
AFIA ENGLISH
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
ENGLISH v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2014cv01937
Plaintiff:
MARGARET ENGLISH
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA , JOHN DOE, 1, JOHN DOE, 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
HOUSTON v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2014cv01727
Plaintiff:
ERIC HOUSTON
Defendant:
P. JOHNSON, ANDERSON and R. ENGLISH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRANT et al v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2014cv01102
Plaintiff:
SANDRA GRANT, DOUGLAS GRANT, HARRISON GRANT and others
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, ROBERT S. MUELLER, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
